4.7 Article

Laboratory assessment of residential building walls containing pipe-encapsulated phase change materials for thermal management

期刊

ENERGY
卷 163, 期 -, 页码 383-391

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.08.159

关键词

Phase change materials (PCM); Thermal energy storage; Wall heat transfer; Building envelope

资金

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [0533362]
  2. National Natural and Science Foundation (China) [51308051]
  3. California Energy Commission [EISG Grant] [03-25]
  4. Hunan Association for Science and Technology [2017TJQ05]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To reduce the heat flow between building interior and exterior environments using thermal energy storage without causing problems related to moisture transfer, this paper presents residential building walls enhanced with pipe-encapsulated phase change materials (PCM). Experimental investigations are conducted to identify thermal performance of building walls with pipe-encapsulated PCM in typical summer conditions. A dynamic wall simulator was designed and built to reproduce residential building indoor and outdoor conditions in a laboratory setting. Two pipe sizes, based on diameter, installed in a horizontal arrangement and placed at various wall depths were investigated. The heat transfer through building walls with pipe-encapsulated PCM was evaluated based on peak heat flux reductions and peak heat flux time shift. The peak heat fluxes of the PCM-outfitted walls were reduced by a maximum of 22.5% for what was referred to as next to wallboard configuration and 36.5% for middle depth configuration, respectively, compared to standard walls. The corresponding daily energy savings were 27.4 W-hr/m(2) and 51.2 W-hr/m(2). PCM encapsulated in smaller pipes installed in the middle depth of the wall cavity is recommended to realize complete solidification and melting for larger peak flux reduction and energy savings. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据