4.5 Article

Adsorption of CO2 and CO on H-zeolites with different framework topologies and chemical compositions and a correlation to probing protonic sites using NH3 adsorption

期刊

JOURNAL OF POROUS MATERIALS
卷 23, 期 2, 页码 291-299

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10934-015-0081-z

关键词

CO2 adsorption; Framework topology; Chemical compositions; Acidity; NH3 adsorption

资金

  1. New & Renewable Energy of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) [20123010100010]
  2. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20123010100010] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adsorption of CO2 and CO at 25 A degrees C has been conducted using commercially-available (Y, ZSM-5) and laboratory-synthesized (SSZ-13, SAPO-34) H-zeolites with different framework topologies and chemical compositions, and their textual and surface properties have been characterized by N-2 sorption and NH3 adsorption techniques. All the zeolites were microporous, although ZSM-5 and SSZ-13 apparently showed a mesoporous sorption behavior due to the interparticle spaces. The zeolites had Si/Al values in the order of SSZ-13 (16.44) > ZSM-5 (16.08) a parts per thousand << Y (2.82) a parts per thousand << SAPO-34 (0.19). Regardless, high CO2 adsorption capacity was obtained for SSZ-13 and SAPO-34 with a CHA framework. The FAU zeolite Y with the highest micropore volume showed less CO2 adsorption than the CHA zeolites and the MFI-type ZSM-5 yielded the poorest performance. Probing acid sites in the H-form zeolites using NH3 disclosed that these all contain both weak and strong acid sites with significant dependence of their strengths and amounts on the topology. The acid strength of the weak acid sites in the CHA zeolites was the weakest, which might allow a stronger interaction with CO2. The H-zeolites gave CO2/CO selectivity factors that were in the range of 4.61-11.0, depending on the framework topology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据