4.7 Article

A data-driven adaptive state of charge and power capability joint estimator of lithium-ion polymer battery used in electric vehicles

期刊

ENERGY
卷 63, 期 -, 页码 295-308

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.10.027

关键词

Electric vehicles; Lithium-ion polymer battery; Data-driven; Adaptive extended Kalman filter; State of charge (SoC); State of power capability (SOP)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51276022]
  2. Higher school discipline innovation intelligence plan (111plan) of China
  3. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2012AA111603, 2011AA11A228, 2011AA1290]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An accurate SoC (state of charge) and SoP (state of power capability) joint estimator is the most significant techniques for electric vehicles. This paper makes two contributions to the existing literature. (1) A data-driven parameter identification method has been proposed for accurately capturing the real-time characteristic of the battery through the recursive least square algorithm, where the parameter of the battery model is updated with the real-time measurements of battery current and voltage at each sampling interval. (2) An adaptive extended Kalman filter algorithm based multi-state joint estimator has been developed in accordance with the relationship of the battery SoC and its power capability. Note that the SoC and SoP can be predicted accurately against the degradation and various operating environments of the battery through the data-driven parameter identification method. The robustness of the proposed data-driven joint estimator has been verified by different degradation states of lithium-ion polymer battery cells. The result indicates that the estimation errors of voltage and SoC are less than 1% even if given a large erroneous initial state of joint estimator, which makes the SoP estimate more accurate and reliable for the electric vehicles application. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据