4.5 Article

Buoyant Unstable Behavior of Initially Spherical Lean Hydrogen-Air Premixed Flames

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 7, 期 8, 页码 4938-4956

出版社

MDPI AG
DOI: 10.3390/en7084938

关键词

lean hydrogen flame; initial spherical flame; buoyant behaviors; experimental observation

资金

  1. Ph.D Programs Foundation of Ministry of Education of China [20110009110023]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [M11JB00300]
  3. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Beijing Jiaotong University [98930098]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Buoyant unstable behavior in initially spherical lean hydrogen-air premixed flames within a center-ignited combustion vessel have been studied experimentally under a wide range of pressures (including reduced, normal, and elevated pressures). The experimental observations show that the flame front of lean hydrogen-air premixed flames will not give rise to the phenomenon of cellular instability when the equivalence ratio has been reduced to a certain value, which is totally different from the traditional understanding of the instability characteristics of lean hydrogen premixed flames. Accompanied by the smoothened flame front, the propagation mode of lean hydrogen premixed flames transitions from initially spherical outwardly towards upwardly when the flames expand to certain sizes. To quantitatively investigate such buoyant instability behaviors, two parameters, float rate (psi) and critical flame radius (R-cr), have been proposed in the present article. The quantitative results demonstrate that the influences of initial pressure (P-int) on buoyant unstable behaviors are different. Based on the effects of variation of density difference and stretch rate on the flame front, the mechanism of such buoyant unstable behaviors has been explained by the competition between the stretch force and the results of gravity and buoyancy, and lean hydrogen premixed flames will display buoyant unstable behavior when the stretch effects on the flame front are weaker than the effects of gravity and buoyancy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据