4.5 Article

Fuel-N Evolution during the Pyrolysis of Industrial Biomass Wastes with High Nitrogen Content

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 5, 期 12, 页码 5418-5438

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en5125418

关键词

Fuel-N; industrial biomass wastes; pyrolysis; NOx precursors; Tar-N; Char-N

资金

  1. Strategic China-Japan Cooperative Program on Science and Technology (S&T) for Environmental Conservation and Construction of a Society with Less Environmental Burden of the National Nature Science Foundation of China [21161140329]
  2. Japan Science and Technology Agency

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, sewage sludge and mycelial waste from antibiotic production were pyrolyzed in a batch scale fixed-bed reactor as examples of two kinds of typical industrial biomass wastes with high nitrogen content. A series of experiments were conducted on the rapid pyrolysis and the slow pyrolysis of these wastes in the temperature range from 500-800 degrees C to investigate the Fuel-N transformation behavior among pyrolysis products. The results showed that Fuel-N conversion to Char-N intimately depended on the pyrolysis temperature and the yield of Char-N reduced with the increase of the pyrolysis temperature. Under the same pyrolysis conditions, Tar-N production mainly depended on complex properties of the different biomasses, including volatile matter, nitrogen content and biomass functional groups. HCN was the predominant NOx precursor in the rapid pyrolysis of biomass, whereas in the slow pyrolysis of mycelial waste, more NH3 was produced than HCN due to the additional NH3 formation through the hydrogenation reaction of Char-N, HCN and H radicals. At the same time, some part of the char was analyzed by Fourier Transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) to get more information on the nitrogen functionality changes and the tar was also characterized by Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry (GCMS) to identify typical nitrogenous tar compounds. Finally, the whole nitrogen distribution in products was discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据