4.5 Article

Impact of Monocarboxylate Transporter-8 Deficiency on the Hypothalamus-Pituitary-Thyroid Axis in Mice

期刊

ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 151, 期 10, 页码 5053-5062

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1210/en.2010-0593

关键词

-

资金

  1. American Thyroid Association
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [HE3848/4-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In patients, inactivating mutations in the gene encoding the thyroid hormone-transporting monocarboxylate transporter 8 (Mct8) are associated with severe mental and neurological deficits and disturbed thyroid hormone levels. The latter phenotype characterized by high T-3 and low T-4 serum concentrations is replicated in Mct8 knockout (ko) mice, indicating that MCT8 deficiency interferes with thyroid hormone production and/or metabolism. Our studies of Mct8 ko mice indeed revealed increased thyroidal T-3 and T-4 concentrations without overt signs of a hyperactive thyroid gland. However, upon TSH stimulation Mct8 ko mice showed decreased T-4 and increased T-3 secretion compared with wild-type littermates. Moreover, similar changes in the thyroid hormone secretion pattern were observed in Mct8/Trhr1 double-ko mice, which are characterized by normal serum T-3 levels and normal hepatic and renal D1 expression in the presence of very low T-4 serum concentrations. These data strongly indicate that absence of Mct8 in the thyroid gland affects thyroid hormone efflux by shifting the ratio of the secreted hormones toward T-3. To test this hypothesis, we generated Mct8/Pax8 double-mutant mice, which in addition to Mct8 lack a functional thyroid gland and are therefore completely athyroid. Following the injection of these animals with either T-4 or T-3, serum analysis revealed T-3 concentrations similar to those observed in Pax8 ko mice under thyroid hormone replacement, indicating that indeed increased thyroidal T-3 secretion in Mct8 ko mice represents an important pathogenic mechanism leading to the high serum T-3 levels. (Endocrinology 151: 5053-5062, 2010)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据