4.5 Article

Premenstrual regulation of the pro-angiogenic factor CYR61 in human endometrium

期刊

ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 149, 期 5, 页码 2261-2269

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/en.2007-1568

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The pro-angiogenic factor cysteine-rich protein 61 (CYR61/CCN1) mediates different signals in tumorigenesis, angiogenesis and is involved in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. In this study we investigated the temporal and spatial expression pattern in human endometrium during the menstrual cycle and its possible regulation mechanisms in the premenstrual phase. CYR61 transcript expression showed two distinct periods of elevated levels in the proliferative phase and in menstrual effluents. Because the menstrual breakdown of the functionalis is triggered by cytokines, prostaglandins (PGs), as well as hypoxia, we used a benign endometrial cell line to investigate if CYR61 is regulated by these factors. Hypoxic conditions transiently induced CYR61 mRNA levels and enhanced the secretion of the CYR61 protein into the medium. The hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) 1 alpha mediated this effect on CYR61 as evidenced by dimethyloxalylglycine treatment and by HIF alpha short interfering RNA. CYR61 mRNA expression was further regulated by IL-1, TNF alpha, PGE2, and PGF2 alpha. In addition, TNF alpha and PGE2 elevated significantly CYR61 cellular protein levels in well-oxygenated cells but had only a slight effect on the quantity of secreted protein. Moreover, PGE2 combined with hypoxic conditions increased CYR61 mRNA and protein levels synergistically, whereas the combination with TNF alpha abolished the CYR61 levels induced by hypoxia. Together, the up-regulation of CYR61 by hypoxia via HIF alpha, TNF alpha, and PGE2 could represent possible mechanisms for the CYR61 increase at the onset of menstruation. The opposite effect of TNF alpha combined with hypoxia on CYR61 up-regulation could contribute to a balanced expression level of this angiogenic factor in the endometrium.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据