4.3 Article

The abundance of mixotrophic algae drives the carbon isotope composition of the copepod Boeckella gracilipes in shallow Patagonian lakes

期刊

JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH
卷 37, 期 2, 页码 441-451

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/plankt/fbv005

关键词

zooplankton; mixotrophs; carbon stable isotopes; dissolved organic carbon

资金

  1. FONCyT-Fondo para la Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica [PICT 2011-2483, PICT 2011-2240, PICT 2012-1168]
  2. CONICET-Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas [PIP 11420110100015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The importance of allochthonous versus authochthonous carbon in the diet of zooplankters has been discussed at length in the recent literature, the more so for lakes with dissolved organic matter (DOM) concentrations between 3.5 and 25 mg L-1. Here, we investigated the sources of carbon for Boeckella gracilipes (Copepoda, Calanoida) in three Patagonian shallow lakes that have different but relatively moderate DOM concentrations (<5 mg L-1). We linked their delta C-13 values with parameters such as water color (absorbance 440 nm, (abs440)), dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations and the ratio Color(abs440):Chlorophyll a (Chl a). We also determined the isotopic composition of seston and phytoplankton composition. Our results showed a direct relationship between the delta C-13 values of B. gracilipes and seston (r(2) = 0.64, P < 0.001), and we demonstrated the importance of phytoplankton to B. gracilipes as its delta C-13 signal was strongly related to the abundance of the mixotrophic nanoflagellate Chrysochromulina parva (r(2) = 0.86, P < 0.001). We further found an inverse relationship between DOM and the ratio Color(abs440): Chl a and B. gracilipes delta C-13 values (r(2) = 0.67 and 0.56, respectively), which also supported the importance of authochthonous carbon for the copepod. We conclude that phytoplankton, particularly mixotrophic algae, rather than allochthonous carbon, supports the copepod B. gracilipes in shallow Patagonian lakes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据