4.8 Article

Mitochondria-type GPAT is required for mitochondrial fusion

期刊

EMBO JOURNAL
卷 32, 期 9, 页码 1265-1279

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2013.77

关键词

C. elegans; fusion; glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase; lysophosphatidic acid; mitochondria

资金

  1. Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology, Japan Science and Technology Agency
  2. Program for Promotion of Basic and Applied Research for Innovations in Bio-Oriented Industry
  3. Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology
  4. Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [12J10377, 24390053, 24790092, 23227004, 23790256, 24790064] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase (GPAT) is involved in the first step in glycerolipid synthesis and is localized in both the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and mitochondria. To clarify the functional differences between ER-GPAT and mitochondrial (Mt)-GPAT, we generated both GPAT mutants in C. elegans and demonstrated that Mt-GPAT is essential for mitochondrial fusion. Mutation of Mt-GPAT caused excessive mitochondrial fragmentation. The defect was rescued by injection of lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), a direct product of GPAT, and by inhibition of LPA acyltransferase, both of which lead to accumulation of LPA in the cells. Mitochondrial fragmentation in Mt-GPAT mutants was also rescued by inhibition of mitochondrial fission protein DRP-1 and by overexpression of mitochondrial fusion protein FZO-1/mitofusin, suggesting that the fusion/fission balance is affected by Mt-GPAT depletion. Mitochondrial fragmentation was also observed in Mt-GPAT-depleted HeLa cells. A mitochondrial fusion assay using HeLa cells revealed that Mt-GPAT depletion impaired mitochondrial fusion process. We postulate from these results that LPA produced by Mt-GPAT functions not only as a precursor for glycerolipid synthesis but also as an essential factor of mitochondrial fusion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据