4.8 Article

A Drosophila metallophosphoesterase mediates deglycosylation of rhodopsin

期刊

EMBO JOURNAL
卷 30, 期 18, 页码 3701-3713

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2011.254

关键词

alpha-Man-II; deglycosylation; membrane receptor trafficking; metallophosphoesterase; rhodopsin

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30970663, 31070683, 30930051]
  2. New-Century Training Program Foundation for the Talents by the State Education Commission
  3. Youth Foundation of southeast university
  4. NIH [R01-AG022508, R01-EY019060]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oligosaccharide chains of newly synthesized membrane receptors are trimmed and modified to optimize their trafficking and/or signalling before delivery to the cell surface. For most membrane receptors, the functional significance of oligosaccharide chain modification is unknown. During the maturation of Rh1 rhodopsin, a Drosophila light receptor, the oligosaccharide chain is trimmed extensively. Neither the functional significance of this modification nor the enzymes mediating this process are known. Here, we identify a dmppe (Drosophila metallophosphoesterase) mutant with incomplete deglycosylation of Rh1, and show that the retained oligosaccharide chain does not affect Rh1 localization or signalling. The incomplete deglycosylation, however, renders Rh1 more sensitive to endocytic degradation, and causes morphological and functional defects in photoreceptors of aged dmppe flies. We further demonstrate that the dMPPE protein functions as an Mn2+/Zn2+-dependent phosphoesterase and mediates in vivo dephosphorylation of alpha-Man-II. Most importantly, the dephosphorylated alpha-Man-II is required for the removal of the Rh1 oligosaccharide chain. These observations suggest that the glycosylation status of membrane proteins is controlled through phosphorylation/dephosphorylation, and that MPPE acts as the phosphoesterase in this regulation. The EMBO Journal (2011) 30, 3701-3713. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.254; Published online 29 July 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据