4.5 Article

Determination of malachite green in fish water samples by cloud-point extraction coupled to cation-selective exhaustive injection and sweeping-MEKC

期刊

ELECTROPHORESIS
卷 31, 期 4, 页码 688-694

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/elps.200900565

关键词

Cation-selective exhaustive injection; Cloud-point extraction; Malachite green; Sweeping-MEKC

资金

  1. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [50725825]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20765003]
  3. Scientific Research Fund of Jiangxi Provincial Education Department [GJJ08200]
  4. Opening Fund of Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology
  5. Traditional Chinese Medicine Research
  6. Human Normal University [KLCBTCMR2008-6]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have employed a high-sensitivity off-line coupled with on-line preconcentration method, cloud-point extraction (CPE)/cation-selective exhaustive injection (CSEI) and sweeping-MEKC, for the analysis of malachite green. The variables that affect CPE were investigated. The optimal conditions were 250 g/L of Triton X-100, 10% of Na(2)SO(4) (W/V), heat-assisted at 60 degrees C for 20min. We monitored the effects of several of the CSEI-sweeping-MEKC parameters - including the type of BGE, the concentrations of SDS, the injection length of the high-conductivity buffer, and the injection time of the sample - to optimize the separation process. The optimal BGE was 50 mM citric acid (pH 2.2) containing 100 mM SDS. In addition, electrokinetic injection of the sample at 15 kV for 800 s provided both high separation efficiency and enhanced sweeping sensitivity. The sensitivity enhancement for malachite green was 1.9 x 10(4) relative to CZE; the coefficients of determination exceeded 0.9928. The LOD, based on an S/N of 3:1, of CSEI-sweeping-MEKC was 0.87 ng/mL; in contrast, when using off-line CPE/CSEI-sweeping-MEKC the sensitivity increased to 69.6 pg/mL. This proposed method was successfully applied to determine trace amounts of malachite green in fish water samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据