4.6 Article

A novel strategy for the construction of photoelectrochemical sensors based on quantum dots and electron acceptor: The case of dopamine detection

期刊

ELECTROCHEMISTRY COMMUNICATIONS
卷 41, 期 -, 页码 47-50

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2014.01.014

关键词

Photoelectrochemical sensor; Electron acceptor; Quantum dots

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21005031, 21275065]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [JUSRP51314B]
  3. MOE & SAFEA for the 111 Project [B13025]
  4. Opening Foundation of the State Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Life Science of Nanjing University [KLACLS1008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most of the current techniques for the photoelectrochemical detection based on the hole oxidation of the reductive substances (acting as electron donor) present in the electrolytes. In this paper, we report a new concept to construct photoelectrochemical sensors based on the interaction between photo-excited electrons of quantum dots (QDs) and electron acceptors. It was found that benzoquinone (BQ) could act as an efficient electron acceptor of the photo-excited CdS QDs, thus blocking the electron transfer of CdS to the indium tin oxide (ITO) electrode, leading to decreased photocurrent Based on this phenomenon, a novel photoelectrochemical sensor for dopamine (DA) was developed. DA can be oxidized under weakly alkaline (pH 9.0) solution or by electro-deposition in neutral (pH 7.0) solution to form poly-dopamine. Poly-dopamine has abundant benzoquinone (BQ) groups, which acted as electron acceptors of the conduction band electrons of the photo-excited CdS QDs, leading to decreased photocurrent of CdS QDs. The method could detect DA with highly selectivity and sensitivity. This photoelectrochemical strategy based on photo-induced electron transfer between the electron acceptor and QDs opened a new avenue for the design of novel photoelectrochemical sensors. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据