4.5 Article

What Drives Ontogenetic Niche Shifts of Fishes in Coral Reef Ecosystems?

期刊

ECOSYSTEMS
卷 16, 期 5, 页码 783-796

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10021-013-9645-4

关键词

survival; food abundance; growth; trade-offs; coral reef; mangrove; seagrass

类别

资金

  1. WOTRO Science for Global Development by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO)
  2. Vidi grant from NWO
  3. Schure-Beijerinck-Popping Fonds
  4. Graeve Francken Fund
  5. AUV-Fund of the University of Amsterdam
  6. University of Groningen Marco Polo Fund
  7. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Center for Bottomland Hardwoods Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ontogenetic niche shifts are taxonomically and ecologically widespread across the globe. Consequently, identifying the ecological mechanics that promote these shifts at diverse scales is central to an improved understanding of ecosystems generally. We evaluated multiple potential drivers of ontogenetic niche shifts (predation, growth, maturation, diet shifts, and food availability) for three fish species between connected coral reef and nearshore habitats. In all cases, neither diet compositional change nor sexual maturity functioned as apparent triggers for emigration from juvenile to adult habitats. Rather, the fitness advantages conferred on reef inhabitants (that is, enhanced growth rates) were primarily related to high prey availability on reefs. However, there exists a clear trade-off to this benefit as survival rates for small fishes were significantly reduced on reefs, thereby revealing the potential value of (and rationale behind high juvenile abundances in) nearshore habitat as predation refugia. We ultimately conclude that predation risk functions as the primary early life stage inhibitor of ontogenetic niche shifts towards more profitable adult habitats in these systems. Furthermore, this study provides a case study for how complex, meta-dynamic populations and ecosystems might be better understood through the elucidation of simple ecological trade-offs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据