4.3 Article

Spatial network structure and robustness of detritus-based communities in a patchy environment

期刊

ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH
卷 25, 期 4, 页码 813-821

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1007/s11284-010-0711-5

关键词

Detritus colonization; Macroinvertebrate; Network; Perturbation; Spatial homogenization

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mechanisms that regulate the spatial distribution of species are an essential aid to understanding the effects of the environment on the persistence of populations and communities. The effects of spatial structure on the persistence and robustness of ecological communities can, in turn, prove useful in uncovering their functioning, e.g., in the decomposition of leaf detritus. We applied the framework of complex networks to evaluate the effects of spatial structure on the colonization process of leaf detritus in a patchy aquatic environment, with a spatial network of six pools at different salinity. We found three well-defined modules formed by groups of taxa sharing the same pools, observing an association between modularity and spatial proximity of pools. Modules maximize the number of links within modules, and minimize the number of links among modules, showing the presence of a strong site-specific association between taxa and pools. The topological characteristics of the network show robustness against random perturbations and a lower tolerance of targeted perturbations. These findings suggest that random events, such as flooding or heavy rains, slightly affect the robustness of the system, while localized perturbations on the most connected nodes could have a negative effect on the connectivity of the whole network. The consequences could lead to a structural and functional homogenization of the system, with potential effects for the entire trophic chain. Here we discuss the topological properties of the network in relation to the spatial distribution of pools, showing how network analysis can yield valuable insight for conservation and management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据