4.3 Article

Effects of ectomycorrhizal colonization and nitrogen fertilization on morphology of root tips in a Larix gmelinii plantation in northeastern China

期刊

ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH
卷 25, 期 2, 页码 295-302

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1007/s11284-009-0654-x

关键词

Ectomycorrhizal fungi; Larix gmelinii; Maoershan Forest Research Station; Nitrogen fertilization; Root-tip morphology

类别

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [30130160]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Root morphology is important in understanding root functions in forest ecosystems. However, the effects of ectomycorrhizal colonization and soil nutrient availability on root morphology is not clear. In this study, root morphology in relation to season, soil depth, soil nitrogen (N) availability, and mycorrhizal fungal colonization were investigated in a larch (Larix gmelinii) plantation in northeastern China. The first-order roots (or root tips) of larch were sampled four times in May, July, and September of 2005, and May of 2006 from two depths of upper soil layer (0-10 and 10-20 cm) in the control and the N-fertilized plots. The results showed that ectomycorrhizal (ECM) colonization rates for the first-order roots were reduced by 17% under N fertilization. The peak of root colonization rates occurred in summer and was positively correlated with soil temperature. ECM colonization significantly altered root morphology: root diameter was increased by 19 and 29%, root length shortened by 27 and 25%, and specific root length (SRL) reduced by 16 and 19% for the control and the N-fertilized plots, respectively. N fertilization led to decreased root length, but did not affect root diameter and SRL. In addition, effects of ECM colonization on root morphology varied with season and soil depth. The observed relationships among ECM fungal colonization, soil N availability, and root-tip morphology should improve our understanding of how root tips respond to environmental changes in soil in temperate forest ecosystems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据