4.5 Article

Instantaneous intake rate of herbivores as function of forage quality and mass:: Effects on facilitative and competitive interactions

期刊

ECOLOGICAL MODELLING
卷 213, 期 3-4, 页码 273-284

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.12.009

关键词

alternative stable states; co-existence; competition; grazing; facilitation; forage intake; forage quality; lawn grass

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The functional response as the link between the consumer and its resource is a central issue in herbivore-vegetation interactions. Vegetation often consists of low and high quality tissue due to nutritional or structural differences. It has been observed that the instantaneous intake rate of herbivores decreases with decreasing forage quality. However, so far variation in forage quality is not explicitly considered when modeling this instantaneous intake rate. In this paper, we derive a model for the instantaneous intake rate depending on forage quality, i.e., the proportion of high quality tissue in the vegetation. In the model, a downward deflection of the functional response curve is caused by a reduction of the maximum consumption rate at high proportions of low quality tissue. The model gives a mechanistic explanation for decreasing intake rate with decreasing forage quality. Compared to a conventional functional response model with constant maximum consumption rate, a herbivore-grass model with the forage quality-dependent functional response leads to discontinuous changes in the vegetation and herbivore density. The effects hinge on the positive feedback between herbivore density and the proportion of high quality forage. Our analyses show that this positive feedback can explain the maintenance of lawn grass where a high herbivore density can maintain high quality forage. The model results indicate that depending on the coefficients of trophic conversion from resource to consumer, coexistence, facilitation and competitive exclusion between differently sized herbivore species can emerge. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据