4.4 Article

A facultative mutualism between aphids and an invasive ant increases plant reproduction

期刊

ECOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY
卷 35, 期 2, 页码 190-199

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2009.01172.x

关键词

Ant-aphid interaction; Aphis gossypii; biological control; biological invasions; herbivory; indirect effects; plant defence; Solenopsis invicta

资金

  1. USDA- SARE
  2. Alabama Fire Ant Management Program
  3. Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology
  4. Graduate School, Auburn University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

2. We conducted field and greenhouse experiments in which we manipulated the presence and absence of cotton aphids (Aphis gossypii) on cotton plants to test the hypothesis that a mutualism between cotton aphids and an invasive ant, the red imported fire ant (Solenopsis invicta), benefits cotton plants by increasing fire ant suppression of caterpillars. We also manipulated caterpillar abundance to test whether the benefit of the mutualism varied with caterpillar density. 3. We found that more fire ants foraged on plants with cotton aphids than on plants without cotton aphids, which resulted in a significant reduction in caterpillar survival and caterpillar herbivory of leaves, flower buds, and bolls on plants with aphids. Consequently, cotton aphids indirectly increased cotton reproduction: plants with cotton aphids produced 16% more bolls, 25% more seeds, and 10% greater seedcotton mass than plants without aphids. The indirect benefit of cotton aphids, however, varied with caterpillar density: the number of bolls per plant at harvest was 32% greater on plants with aphids than on plants without aphids at high caterpillar density, versus just 3% greater at low caterpillar density. 4. Our results highlight the potential benefit to plants that host ant-hemipteran mutualisms and provide the first experimental evidence that the consequences to plants of an ant-aphid mutualism vary at different densities of non-aphid herbivores.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据