4.6 Article

Floating treatment wetland retrofit to improve stormwater pond performance for suspended solids, copper and zinc

期刊

ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
卷 54, 期 -, 页码 173-182

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.01.031

关键词

Floating treatment wetland; Stormwater; Zinc; Copper; Total suspended solids; Treatment; Performance; Nonpoint source pollution; Constructed wetland; Retention pond

资金

  1. Auckland Council
  2. Auckland Motorway Alliance/New Zealand Transport Agency

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A field trial study with side-by-side monitoring of two parallel stormwater treatment ponds, one of which contained a floating treatment wetland (FTW), has been carried out to assess the benefit of retrofitting a conventional retention pond with a FTW. Inflow and outflow event mean concentrations (EMCs) were quantified and used to assess the overall pollutant removal efficiency of each system. Findings show that a FTW can significantly improve the runoff water quality and thus reduce the impact on the receiving environment. The present study reveals that a pond retrofit with a FTW would be more efficient than a conventional retention pond, exhibiting a 41% (for total suspended solids - TSS), 40% (for particulate zinc - PZn), 39% (for particulate copper - PCu) and 16% (for dissolved copper - DCu) lower effluent EMC. Physical entrapment of the particulate pollutants into the roots' biofilm seems be a significant removal pathway, which could be impacted by the inflow volume. Due to higher humic content, lower dissolved oxygen and more neutral water column pH induced by the FTW, there was increased potential for adsorption processes and/or precipitation as insoluble copper sulphides, in addition to the direct Cu uptake by the plants. The dissolved zinc (DZn) inlet EMCs, which already met the Australian and New Zealand Environment Conservation Council (ANZECC) water quality guidelines and could correspond to an irreducible concentration of the system, were too low to differentiate the performance of either pond. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据