4.7 Article

Laboratory experiments on the breakup of liquid metal diapirs

期刊

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
卷 403, 期 -, 页码 236-245

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2014.06.044

关键词

metal diapir; breakup; core formation; magma ocean; metal-silicate equilibration; laboratory experiments

资金

  1. European Commission, Research Executive Agency, Marie Curie Actions [FP7-PEOPLE-2011-IOF-298238]
  2. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-10-PDOC-001-01]
  3. NSF Geophysics Program
  4. Directorate For Geosciences
  5. Division Of Earth Sciences [1068019, 1246861] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The validity of the iron rain scenario, i.e. the widely accepted model for the dynamics of iron sedimentation through a magma ocean during the latest stage of the Earth's accretion, is explored via a suite of laboratory experiments. Liquid gallium and mixtures of water and glycerol are used as analogs of the iron and the molten silicate respectively. This allows us to investigate the effects of the viscosity ratio between iron and silicate and to reproduce the relevant effects of surface tension on the fragmentation dynamics. While the classical iron rain scenario considers a population of purely spherical drops with a single characteristic radius that fall towards the bottom of the magma ocean at a unique velocity without any further change, our experiments exhibit a variety of stable shapes for liquid metal drops, a large distribution of sizes and velocities, and an intense internal dynamics within the cloud with the superimposition of further fragmentations and merging events. Our results demonstrate that rich and complex dynamics occur in models of molten metal diapir physics. Further, we hypothesize that the inclusion of such flows into state of the art thermochemical equilibration models will generate a similarly broad array of complex, and likely novel, behaviors. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据