4.7 Article

Late Glacial to Holocene radiocarbon constraints on North Pacific Intermediate Water ventilation and deglacial atmospheric CO2 sources

期刊

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
卷 397, 期 -, 页码 57-66

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2014.04.004

关键词

North Pacific; ventilation; radiocarbon; deglaciation

资金

  1. NSF [AGS-0602395, EAR-0711584]
  2. Directorate For Geosciences
  3. Division Of Ocean Sciences [0962077, 1204204] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Division Of Ocean Sciences
  5. Directorate For Geosciences [1357529] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Radiocarbon reconstructions of past ocean ventilation rates constrain oceanic sources and sinks of CO2 and mechanisms of subsurface hypoxia. Here, C-14 in coexisting benthic and planktonic foraminifera from a sediment core 682 m deep off Southeast Alaska documents paleoventilation over the past similar to 17,000 years. A chronology based on calibrated planktonic foraminiferal dates, consistent with independent terrestrial dates for regional glacial retreat, yields deglacial projection ages moderately greater than those of the Holocene, suggesting comparatively limited ventilation. The observed Holocene increase of apparent ventilation at intermediate depths tracks inundation of the Bering Strait between similar to 11,800 and 13,200 years ago, suggesting that flooding of continental shelves and export of low-salinity surface waters to the Arctic enhanced intermediate water formation in the North Pacific. An abrupt increase in the benthic-planktonic radiocarbon age gradient, implying homogenization of abyssal radiocarbon in deep and intermediate waters, aligns with the younger of two episodes of rapid rise of atmospheric CO2 and depletion of atmospheric Delta C-14 during deglaciation (similar to 11,500-13,000 years ago), suggesting the North Pacific as a possible pathway for venting of oceanic CO2 to the atmosphere during the second half of the deglacial transition. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据