4.3 Article

Behavioural problems at the age of eleven years in preterm-born children with or without fetal brain sparing: A prospective cohort study

期刊

EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
卷 86, 期 6, 页码 379-384

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2010.04.007

关键词

Fetal brain sparing; Behavioural problems; Intra uterine growth restriction; Very low birth weight infant

资金

  1. Dutch Brain Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: In severe intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) due to placental insufficiency a haemodynamic adaptation occurs, resulting in preferential blood flow to the fetal brain (brain sparing). With Doppler ultrasound an increased ratio between the umbilical and the cerebral artery pulsatility index (U/C ratio) can be demonstrated. IUGR is associated with impaired neurodevelopmental outcome. Objective: Evaluation of the effect of fetal brain sparing on behavioural problems at eleven years in premature born children. Methods: Prospective cohort study in premature children born in 1989, with a gestational age of 26 0/7 to 33 0/7 weeks. An U/C ratio>0.72 was defined as brain sparing. Behavioural problems were assessed with the parent-reported Child Behaviour Check List (CBCL) and the Teacher's Report Form (TRF). T scores >60 for total problem score and subscales of internalizing and externalizing behaviour, were considered abnormal. Results: Ninety-eight of the 116 survivors were assessed, of which 31 with antenatally established fetal brain sparing. According to the CBCL-total problem score 23.3% of the premature born babies in the brain sparing group had behavioural problems compared with 22.8% of those without brain sparing. According to the TRF-total problem score the percentages were 21.4% and 20.0%, respectively. Logistic regression analysis failed to show a significant association of U/C ratio with behavioural problems. In this model oxygen dependency at 28 days, IQ<85 at five years, cranial ultrasound abnormalities, fetal growth ratio <0.80, Apgar scores <7 after 5 min and birth weight

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据