4.3 Article

Fatty acid composition of the brain of intrauterine growth retardation rats and the effect of maternal docosahexaenoic acid enriched diet

期刊

EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
卷 85, 期 12, 页码 733-735

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2009.09.006

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology [20591306]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20591306] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: To determine whether the intrauterine environment affects lipid metabolism, we measured the fatty acid composition of the brain in rats with intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) induced by synthetic thromboxane A2 (STA2). Additionally, we evaluated the effect of maternal docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)-enriched diet. Methods: Two experimental diets were provided: soy bean oil and DHA-enriched diets. Maternal rats were divided randomly into three groups, STA2-/Soy (Sham), STA2+/Soy (IUGR), and STA2+/DHA (DHA) groups. The Sham and IUGR groups were fed the soy diet, and the DHA group received the DHA-enriched diet from embryonic day 7 until delivery. on postnatal days 1 and 7, the pups were weighed and their brains were removed for lipid analysis. Results: The body weight of the IUGR and DHA groups was significantly less than that of the Sham group both on the postnatal days 1 and 7, whereas it was not significantly different between the IUGR and DHA groups either on postnatal day 1 or day 7. There was no significant difference in the percentage of DHA between the Sham and IUGR groups either on postnatal day 1 or 7. On the other hand, the percentage of DHA was higher in the DHA group than in the IUGR group both on the postnatal days 1 and 7. Conclusions: The fatty acid composition in the brain was not altered in the STA2-induced IUGR rat model. Increased DHA percentage was observed in the maternal DHA-enriched diet group, although no beneficial effect on body weight gain was observed. (c) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据