4.5 Article

Molecular Dynamics Simulations of a Powder Model of the Intrinsically Disordered Protein Tau

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 119, 期 39, 页码 12580-12589

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b05849

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Academy of Sciences Leopoldina
  2. Cluster of Excellence RESOLV - Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [EXC-1069]
  3. CEA
  4. CNRS
  5. UJF
  6. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-11-BSV5-027]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The tau protein, whose aggregates are involved in Alzheirner's disease, is an intrinsically disordered protein (IDP) that regulates microtubule activity in neurons. An IDP lacks a single, well-defined structure and, rather, constantly exchanges among multiple conformations. In order to study IDP dynamics, the combination of experimental techniques, such as neutron scattering, and computational techniques, such as molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, is a powerful approach. Amorphous hydrated powder samples have been very useful for studying protein internal dynamics experimentally, e.g, using neutron scattering. Thus, there is demand for realistic in silico models of hydrated protein powders. Here we present an MD simulation analysis of a powder hydrated at 0.4 g water/g protein of the IDP tau in the temperature range 20-300 K. By comparing with neutron scattering data, we identify the protein water interface as the predominant feature determining IDP dynamics. The so-called protein dynamical transition is shown to be attenuated, but not suppressed, in the parts of the protein that are not exposed to the solvent. In addition, we find similarities in the mean-squared displacements of the core of a globular protein and dry clusters forrned by the IDP in hydrated powders. Thus, the ps to ns dynamics of proteins in hydrated powders originate mainly from those residues in contact with solvent. We propose that by measuring the dynamics of protein assemblies, such as aggregates, one might assess qualitatively their state of hydration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据