4.6 Review

A Review of Pharmacogenetics of Adverse Drug Reactions in Elderly People

期刊

DRUG SAFETY
卷 35, 期 -, 页码 3-20

出版社

ADIS INT LTD
DOI: 10.1007/BF03319099

关键词

-

资金

  1. Italian National Research Centre on Aging (INRCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Older adults are more susceptible to the prevalence of therapeutic failure and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Recent advances in genomic research have shed light on the crucial role of genetic variants, mainly involving genes encoding drug-metabolizing enzymes, drug transporters and genes responsible for a compound's mechanism of action, in driving different treatment responses among individuals, in terms of therapeutic efficacy and safety. The inter-individual variations of these genes may account for the differences observed in drug efficacy and the appearanc,e of ADRs in elderly people. The advent of whole genome mapping techniques has allowed researchers to begin to characterize the genetic components underlying serious ADRs. The identification and validation of these genetic markers will enable the screening of patients at risk of serious ADRs and to establish personalized treatment regimens. The aim of this review was to provide an update on the recent developments in geriatric pharmacogenetics in clinical practice by reviewing the available evidence in the PubMed database to September 2012. A Pubmed search was performed (years 1999-2012) using the following two search strategies: ('pharmacogenomic' OR 'pharmacogenetic') AND 'geriatric' or 'elderly') AND 'adverse drug reactions'; [gene name] AND ('geriatric' or 'elderly') AND 'adverse drug reactions', in which the gene names were those contained in the Table of Pharmacogenomic Biomarkers in Drug Labels published online by the US Food and Drug Administration (http://www.fda.gov/drugs/scienceresearch/researchareas/pharmacogenetics/ucm083378.htm). Reference lists of included original articles and relevant review articles were also screened. The search was limited to studies published in the English language.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据