4.4 Article

Gender differences in clinical outcomes for cocaine dependence: Randomized clinical trials of behavioral therapy and disulfiram

期刊

DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE
卷 145, 期 -, 页码 156-167

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.10.007

关键词

Cocaine; Sex; Gender; Psychotherapy; CBT; Disulfiram

资金

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) [R01 DA015969-09S1]
  2. ORWH [K12DA031050]
  3. NIDA
  4. NIAAA
  5. OD
  6. [P50-DA09241]
  7. [U10 DA015831]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Despite extensive research on gender differences in addiction, there are relatively few published reports comparing treatment outcomes for women versus men based on evidence-based treatments evaluated in randomized clinical trials. Methods: An aggregate sample comprised of data from five randomized clinical trials of treatment for cocaine dependence (N = 434) was evaluated for gender differences in clinical outcomes. Secondary analyses compared gender differences in outcome by medication condition (disulfiram versus no medication) and across multiple behavioral treatment conditions. Results: Women, compared with men, had poorer treatment outcomes on multiple measures of cocaine use during treatment and at post-treatment follow-up. These results appear to be primarily accounted for by disulfiram being less effective in women compared with men. There was no evidence of meaningful gender differences in outcome as a function of the behavioral therapies evaluated. Conclusions: These findings suggest that women and men may benefit to similar degrees from some empirically validated behavioral treatments for addiction. Conversely, some addiction pharmacotherapies, such as disulfiram, may be associated with poorer outcomes among women relative to men and point to the need for careful assessment of pharmacological treatments in both sexes prior to widespread clinical implementation. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据