4.2 Article

Evaluation of Streptococcus iniae killed bacterin and live attenuated vaccines in hybrid striped bass through injection and bath immersion

期刊

DISEASES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS
卷 89, 期 2, 页码 117-123

出版社

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/dao02192

关键词

Streptococcus iniae; Live attenuated vaccine; Hybrid striped bass; M-like protein; Capsular polysaccharide; Phosphoglucomutase

资金

  1. US Department of Commerce's National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) [NA04OAR4170038, 59-A-N]
  2. NIH [5 T32 GM067550]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Streptococcus iniae poses a serious threat to finfish aquaculture operations worldwide. Stringent regulatory standards limit the use of antibiotics to treat S. iniae infections; improved vaccination strategies are thus of great interest. We investigated the potential for efficient, non-injectable batch vaccination via the use of live attenuated vaccines. Three attenuated S. iniae strains with genetic mutations eliminating the production of virulence factors capsular polysaccharide (Delta cpsD), M-like protein (Delta simA), and phosphoglucomutase (Delta pgmA) were evaluated in parallel with an adjuvanted, formalin-killed, whole-cell S. iniae bacterin. Juvenile hybrid striped bass (HSB; Morone chrysops x M. saxatilis) were vaccinated through intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection or bath immersion and held for 800 degree-days prior to challenge with a lethal dose of the virulent wild-type (WT) S. iniae parent strain. The Delta cpsD, Delta pgmA, and bacterin vaccines provided the highest level of vaccination safety (0% mortality), whereas the Delta simA mutant, although it caused 12 to 16% vaccination-related mortality, was the only vaccine candidate to provide 100% protection in both i.p. and immersion delivery models. Our studies demonstrate the efficacy of live attenuated vaccines for prevention of S. iniae infection, and identify immersion delivery of live vaccines as an attractive option for use in commercial aquaculture settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据