4.2 Article

Variable region of betanodavirus RNA2 is sufficient to determine host specificity

期刊

DISEASES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS
卷 79, 期 3, 页码 199-205

出版社

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/dao01906

关键词

betanodavirus; host specificity; viral nervous necrosis; chimeric virus; RNA2; T4 region; SJNNV; RGNNV

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Betanodaviruses, the causative agents of viral nervous necrosis in marine fish, have bipartite positive-sense RNA genomes. The viruses have been classified into 4 distinct types based on nucleotide sequence similarities in the variable region (the so-called T4 region) of the smaller genomic segment RNA2 (1.4 kb). Betanodaviruses have marked host specificity, although the primary structures of the viral RNAs and encoded proteins are similar among the viruses. We have previously demonstrated, using reassortants between striped jack nervous necrosis virus (SJNNV) and redspotted grouper nervous necrosis virus (RGNNV), that RNA2, which encodes the coat protein, strictly controls host specificity. However, because RNA2 is large, we were unable to propose a mechanism underlying this RNA2-based host specificity. To identify the RNA2 region that controls host specificity, we constructed RNA2 chimeric viruses from SJNNV and RGNNV and tested their infectivity in the original host fish, striped jack Pseudocaranx dentex and sevenband grouper Epinephelus septemfasciatus. Among these chimeric viruses, SJNNV mutants containing the variable region of RGNNV RNA2 infected sevenband grouper larvae in a manner similar to RGNNV, while RGNNV mutants containing the variable region of SJNNV RNA2 infected striped jack larvae in a manner similar to SJNNV. Immunofluorescence microscopic studies using anti-SJNNV polyclonal antibodies revealed that these chimeric viruses multiplied in the brains, spinal cords and retinas of the infected fish, as in infections by the parental viruses. These results indicate that the variable region of RNA2 is sufficient to control host specificity in SJNNV and RGNNV.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据