4.5 Article

From shape to cells: mouse models reveal mechanisms altering palate development in Apert syndrome

期刊

DISEASE MODELS & MECHANISMS
卷 6, 期 3, 页码 768-779

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/dmm.010397

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Craniofacial and Dental Research, National Institutes of Health
  2. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act [R01 DE018500, 3R01 DE018500-02S1, 5R01 DE022988]
  3. Comissionat per a Universitats i Recerca, Generalitat de Catalunya (Spain) [2008 BP A 00170]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Apert syndrome is a congenital disorder characterized by severe skull malformations and caused by one of two missense mutations, S252W and P253R, on fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2). The molecular bases underlying differential Apert syndrome phenotypes are still poorly understood and it is unclear why cleft palate is more frequent in patients carrying the S252W mutation. Taking advantage of Apert syndrome mouse models, we performed a novel combination of morphometric, histological and immunohistochemical analyses to precisely quantify distinct palatal phenotypes in Fgfr2(+/S252W) and Fgfr2(+/P253R) mice. We localized regions of differentially altered FGF signaling and assessed local cell patterns to establish a baseline for understanding the differential effects of these two Fgfr2 mutations. Palatal suture scoring and comparative 3D shape analysis from high resolution mu CT images of 120 newborn mouse skulls showed that Fgfr2(+/S252W) mice display relatively more severe palate dysmorphologies, with contracted and more separated palatal shelves, a greater tendency to fuse the maxillary-palatine sutures and aberrant development of the inter-premaxillary suture. These palatal defects are associated with suture-specific patterns of abnormal cellular proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis. The posterior region of the developing palate emerges as a potential target for therapeutic strategies in clinical management of cleft palate in Apert syndrome patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据