4.4 Article

ICF-CY based assessment tool for children with autism

期刊

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
卷 35, 期 8, 页码 678-685

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2012.705946

关键词

Autism; children; ICF-CY; international classification of functioning; disability and health - children and youth

资金

  1. National Science Council, Taiwan [NSC 96-2314-B-040-010-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The objectives of this study was to develop an International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-Children and Youth (ICF-CY) based questionnaire for children with autism, investigate the inter-rater reliability of the questionnaire and assess functional performance in children with autism. Method: The ICF-CY based questionnaire for children with autism comprised 118 items was designed with reference the ICF-CY structure. The study protocol was divided into two parts. In the first part, the inter-rater reliability of the questionnaire was investigated using information from 26 children (aged 3-6 years) with autism and using the intra-class correlation coefficients to estimate reliability. The second part of the study aimed to assess functional performance of another independent sample (136 children, aged 3-6 years) utilizing the questionnaire. Mean scores were compared by nonparametric statistic. Results: The inter-rater reliability for each domains of the questionnaire was found to be moderate to high (intra-class correlation coefficients ranged from 0.72 to 0.97). Children with autism had major problems in voice and speech functions. They had high dependency when executing individual activities of learning and applied knowledge. They also required maximal assistance while engaging in social activities related to conversation and major life categories. Conclusions: This preliminary study shows that ICF-CY based questionnaire has good reliability and can reflect the functional profile of preschool children with autism. However, further study is needed to confirm other psychometric characteristics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据