4.4 Review

β-Cell Dysfunction in Chronic Pancreatitis

期刊

DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES
卷 57, 期 7, 页码 1764-1772

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-012-2086-7

关键词

beta-cell dysfunction; Inflammation; Interferon gamma; Transcription factors; Secondary diabetes

资金

  1. Indian Council of Medical Research [ICMR 5/4/3-10/09-NCD-II]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a progressive inflammatory disease characterized by irreversible destruction of pancreatic secretory parenchyma, fibrosis, exocrine atrophy, and endocrine insufficiency leading to diabetes. Secondary diabetes occurring in CP subsequent to destruction of pancreatic beta-cells is distinct, since it involves beta-cell dysfunction amidst an inflammatory milieu. Even though considerable knowledge is available on the pathophysiology and clinical management of CP, relatively much less is known about the molecular events leading to beta-cell dysfunction. Investigators have demonstrated that altered morphology, reduced beta-cell mass, and beta-cell numbers result in endocrine insufficiency. However, recent reports and our observations suggest that beta-cell dysfunction develops in the early stages of CP while clinical diabetes manifests later, when there is profound fibrosis. In the early stages, altered internal milieu and physiology arising due to inflammation and release of cytokines might lead to deranged signaling pathways and islet dysfunction. Subsequently, development of fibrosis causes islet destruction. This suggests that endocrine deficiency in CP is multifactorial. Although the role of transcription factors (Pdx-1, MafA, NeuroD) on beta-cell functions is understood, alterations in internal milieu of pancreatic tissue that affects beta-cell functions in CP has not been elucidated. In this review, we summarize the factors that have an effect on islet functions. Understanding molecular events of beta-cell dysfunction in CP can lead to the development of targeted preventive and therapeutic modalities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据