4.5 Article

Predictors of survival in patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction: A patient-oriented decision approach for palliative treatment

期刊

DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE
卷 43, 期 7, 页码 548-552

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2011.01.017

关键词

Duodenum; Endoscopy; Pancreatic cancer; Surgery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Gastrojejunostomy and stentplacement are the most commonly used treatments for malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). The preference for either treatment largely depends on the expected survival. Our objective was to investigate predictors of survival in patients with malignant GOO and to develop a model that could aid in the decision for either gastrojejunostomy or stentplacement. Methods: Prognostic factors for survival were collected from a literature search and evaluated in our patient population, which included 95 retrospectively and 56 prospectively followed cases. All 151 patients were treated with gastrojejunostomy or stentplacement. Results: A higher WHO performance score was the only significant prognostic factor for survival in our multivariable analysis (HR 2.2 95%CI 1.7-2.9), whereas treatment for obstructive jaundice, gender, age, metastases, weight loss, level of obstruction and pancreatic cancer were not. A prognostic model that includes the WHO score was able to distinguish patients with a poor survival (WHO score 3-4, median survival: 31 days) from those with a relatively intermediate or good survival (WHO score 2, median survival: 69 and WHO score 0-1, median survival: 139 days, respectively). Conclusions: Only the WHO score is a significant predictor of survival in patients with malignant GOO. A simple prognostic model is able to guide the palliative treatment decision for either gastrojejunostomy (WHO score 0-1) or stentplacement (WHO 3-4) in patients with malignant GOO. (C) 2011 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Comparison of lumen-apposing metal stents versus double-pigtail plastic stents for infected necrotising pancreatitis

Lotte Boxhoorn, Robert C. Verdonk, Marc G. Besselink, Marja Boermeester, Thomas L. Bollen, Stefan A. W. Bouwense, Vincent C. Cappendijk, Wouter L. Curvers, Cornelis H. Dejong, Sven M. van Dijk, Hendrik M. van Dullemen, Casper H. J. van Eijck, Erwin J. M. van Geenen, Muhammed Hadithi, Wouter L. Hazen, Pieter Honkoop, Jeanin E. van Hooft, Maarten A. J. M. Jacobs, June E. C. Kievits, Marnix P. M. Kop, Eva Kouw, Sjoerd D. Kuiken, Michiel Ledeboer, Vincent B. Nieuwenhuijs, Lars E. Perk, Jan-Werner Poley, Rutger Quispel, Rogier J. J. de Ridder, Hjalmar C. van Santvoort, Christina J. Sperna Weiland, Martijn W. J. Stommel, Hester C. Timmerhuis, Ben J. Witteman, Devica S. Umans, Niels G. Venneman, Frank P. Vleggaar, Roy L. J. van Wanrooij, Marco J. Bruno, Paul Fockens, Rogier P. Voermans

Summary: In a multicentre prospective cohort study, patients with infected necrotising pancreatitis who underwent endoscopic drainage were compared. The results showed that LAMS did not reduce the need for necrosectomy and the rate of bleeding complications was similar.
Letter Gastroenterology & Hepatology

TENSION Trial to ExTENSION Study: Has Extension Decreased Tension? Reply

Anke M. Onnekink, Jeanin E. Van Hooft, Rogier P. Voermans

GASTROENTEROLOGY (2023)

Article Surgery

Recall bias in pain scores evaluating abdominal wall and groin pain surgery

W. A. R. Zwaans, J. A. de Bruijn, J. P. Dieleman, E. W. Steyerberg, M. R. M. Scheltinga, R. M. H. Roumen

Summary: The purpose of this study was to examine whether patients tend to overestimate or underestimate their pre-operative pain levels when recalling them in the post-operative phase. The study found that a significant percentage of patients experienced recall bias, leading to misclassification of treatment outcomes.

HERNIA (2023)

Article Oncology

Risk of metachronous contralateral breast cancer in patients with primary invasive lobular breast cancer: Results from a nationwide cohort

Delal Akdeniz, Iris Kramer, Carolien H. M. van Deurzen, Bernadette A. M. Heemskerk-Gerritsen, Michael Schaapveld, Pieter J. Westenend, Adri C. Voogd, Agnes Jager, Ewout W. Steyerberg, Stefan Sleijfer, Marjanka K. Schmidt, Maartje J. Hooning

Summary: Lobular and lobular mixed primary breast cancer histology are associated with modestly increased risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC), and personalized risk assessment needs to consider the histology of the primary cancer as well as the impact of systemic therapy.

CANCER MEDICINE (2023)

Article Dermatology

Individualized Risk Prediction for Improved Chronic Wound Management

Vladica M. Velickovic, Tim Spelman, Michael Clark, Sebastian Probst, David G. Armstrong, Ewout Steyerberg

Summary: This review discusses the development of risk prediction tools for chronic wounds and highlights the importance and challenges of regression-based and machine learning methods. Machine learning may be a powerful adjunct for handling complex risk factors in wound healing.

ADVANCES IN WOUND CARE (2023)

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Diagnostic accuracy of the AGA, IAP, and European guidelines for detecting advanced neoplasia in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm/neoplasia

Nadine C. M. van Huijgevoort, Sanne A. M. Hoogenboom, Selma J. Lekkerkerker, Olivier R. Busch, Marco Del Chiaro, Paul Fockens, Inne Somers, Joanne Verheij, Rogier P. Voermans, Marc G. Besselink, Jeanin E. van Hooft

Summary: Background: Follow-up in patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) aims to detect advanced neoplasia (high-grade dysplasia/cancer) in an early stage. The 2015 American Gastroentero-logical Association (AGA), 2017 International Association of Pancreatology (IAP), and the 2018 European Study Group on Cystic tumours of the Pancreas (European) guidelines differ in their recommendations on indications for surgery. However, it remains unclear which guideline is most accurate in predicting advanced neoplasia in IPMN. Methods: Patients who underwent surgery were extracted from a prospective database (January 2006-January 2021). In patients with IPMN, final pathology was compared with the indication for surgery according to the guidelines. ROC-curves were calculated to determine the diagnostic accuracy for each guideline. Results: Overall, 247 patients underwent surgery for cystic lesions. In 145 patients with IPMN, 52 had advanced neoplasia, of which the AGA guideline would have advised surgery in 14 (27%), the IAP and European guideline in 49 (94%) and 50 (96%). In 93 patients without advanced neoplasia, the AGA, IAP, and European guidelines would incorrectly have advised surgery in 8 (8.6%), 77 (83%) and 71 (76%). Conclusion: The European and IAP guidelines are clearly superior in detecting advanced neoplasia in IPMN as compared to the AGA, albeit at the cost of a higher rate of unnecessary surgery. To harmonize care and to avoid confusion caused by conflicting statements, a global evidence-based guideline for PCN in collaboration with the various guidelines groups is required once the current guidelines require an update. (c) 2023 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of IAP and EPC.

PANCREATOLOGY (2023)

Article Surgery

Validation of combined carcinoembryonic antigen and glucose testing in pancreatic cyst fluid to differentiate mucinous from non-mucinous cysts

Myrte Gorris, Frederike Dijk, Arantza Farina, Johannes B. Halfwerk, Gerrit K. Hooijer, Selma J. Lekkerkerker, Rogier P. Voermans, Mattheus C. Wielenga, Marc G. Besselink, Jeanin E. van Hooft

Summary: This study assessed the value of combined CEA and glucose testing in pancreatic cyst fluid, and found that this method has high specificity and sensitivity for differentiating mucinous from non-mucinous pancreatic cystic neoplasms.

SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2023)

Article Medicine, Research & Experimental

Implementation of an evidence-based management algorithm for patients with chronic pancreatitis (COMBO trial): study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster-randomized controlled trial

Florence E. M. de Rijk, Charlotte L. van Veldhuisen, Marc G. Besselink, Jeanin E. van Hooft, Hjalmar C. van Santvoort, Erwin J. M. van Geenen, Cornelis H. van Werkhoven, Pieter Jan F. de Jonge, Marco J. Bruno, Robert C. Verdonk

Summary: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of patient education and standardization of care in improving the quality of life and reducing pain severity in patients with chronic pancreatitis. It uses an evidence-based integrated management algorithm and compares it with current practice. The study's primary outcomes include quality of life and pain level, while secondary outcomes include clinical results, healthcare resource utilization, and social participation level. The study is expected to last for 35 months.

TRIALS (2023)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Intensive Care Unit Physicians' Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence-Based Clinical Decision Support Tools: Preimplementation Survey Study

Siri L. van der Meijden, Anne A. H. de Hond, Patrick J. Thoral, Ewout W. Steyerberg, Ilse M. J. Kant, Giovanni Cina, M. Sesmu Arbous

Summary: This study aimed to investigate physicians' perspectives and decision-making behavior before implementing an AI-CDS tool for predicting readmission and mortality risk after ICU discharge. The survey results showed that most physicians had positive attitudes towards AI and AI-CDS tools, believing that they could support their work. Physicians expressed a willingness to incorporate a discharge AI-CDS tool into their daily clinical practice and recognized its value in their workflows.

JMIR HUMAN FACTORS (2023)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Estimating individualized treatment effects from randomized controlled trials: a simulation study to compare risk-based approaches

Alexandros Rekkas, Peter R. Rijnbeek, David M. Kent, Ewout W. Steyerberg, David van Klaveren

Summary: This study compared easily applicable risk-based methods to find optimal prediction methods for individualized treatment effects. The linear-interaction model showed optimal or close-to-optimal performance in many simulation scenarios. The restricted cubic splines model was optimal for strong non-linear deviations when sample size was larger.

BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2023)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

There is no such thing as a validated prediction model

Ben Van Calster, Ewout W. W. Steyerberg, Laure Wynants, Maarten van Smeden

Summary: Clinical prediction models should be validated before implementation, as the performance of a model may vary across patient populations and measurement procedures. Validation studies should focus on understanding and quantifying heterogeneity and monitoring performance over time, to ensure that prediction models remain up-to-date and safe for clinical decision-making.

BMC MEDICINE (2023)

News Item Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Medical guidelines must not be influenced by commercial interests

Berthold Koletzko, Helena Cortez-Pinto, Matthias Lohr, Jeanin van Hooft, Jonas Rosendahl

UNITED EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY JOURNAL (2023)

News Item Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Task force greener gastroenterology: Towards eco-friendly practices in healthcare

Marjolijn Duijvestein, Reena Sidhu, Alexander Hann, Jeanin van Hooft, Martina Mueller-Schilling

UNITED EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY JOURNAL (2023)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Perspectives on validation of clinical predictive algorithms

Anne A. H. de Hond, Vaibhavi B. B. Shah, Ilse M. J. Kant, Ben Van Calster, Ewout W. Steyerberg, Tina Hernandez-Boussard

Summary: The generalizability of predictive algorithms is crucial for their application in clinical practice. This article provides an overview of three types of generalizability, namely temporal, geographical, and domain generalizability, based on existing literature. These types of generalizability are associated with their respective goals, methodology, and stakeholders.

NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE (2023)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Mining the contribution of intensive care clinical course to outcome after traumatic brain injury

Shubhayu Bhattacharyay, Pier Francesco Caruso, Cecilia Akerlund, Lindsay D. Wilson, Robert K. Stevens, David W. Menon, Ewout W. Steyerberg, David Nelson, Ari Ercole, CENTER TBI Investigators Participants

Summary: Existing methods to characterise the evolving condition of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) do not capture the necessary context for individualising treatment. In this study, the integration of heterogenous data from medical records was used to model the individualised impact of clinical course on 6-month functional outcome. The study showed that static variables accounted for the majority of functional outcome explanation after TBI.

NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE (2023)

暂无数据