4.5 Review

Risk/benefit profile of bevacizumab in metastatic colon cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE
卷 43, 期 4, 页码 286-294

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2010.10.010

关键词

Bevacizumab; Colorectal cancer; Meta-analysis; Toxicity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Bevacizumab, an anti vascular endothelial growth factor antibody is licensed in several tumours and widely used in colorectal cancer. However, bevacizumab has several adverse effects which may appear unexpectedly and differ according to the tumour. Aims: The aim of this work is to quantify the overall risk of bevacizumab-related side effects in patients affected by advanced colorectal cancer and to compare them with its overall benefit. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer. Our primary endpoint was safety and secondary endpoints were overall survival and progression-free survival. The relative risks for side effects were calculated with their 95% confidence interval using the inverse of variance method. For statistically significant relative risks, number needed to harm were calculated. Results: We retrieved six out of 17 eligible papers encompassing 3385 patients. Only hypertension (relative risk 2.98 95% confidence interval 2.32-3.84), gastrointestinal perforations (relative risk 5.04 95% confidence interval 1.72-14.79) and bleeding (relative risk 2.07 95% confidence interval 1.19-3.62) were significantly increased. Bevacizumab significantly improved both overall survival (HR 0.80 95% confidence interval 0.71-0.91) and progression-free survival (hazard ratio (FIR) 0.62 95% confidence interval 0.52-0.74). Number needed to treat for overall survival is 12, whilst number needed to harms ranges from 2 to 14.286. Conclusion: These results show that the benefits of the treatment with bevacizumab outweigh the toxicity that may occur: enough to justify its use in advanced colorectal cancer. (C) 2010 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据