4.4 Article

Total biliary diversion as a treatment option for patients with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis and Alagille syndrome

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY
卷 50, 期 11, 页码 1846-1849

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.07.016

关键词

Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis; Alagille syndrome; Biliary diversion; Malabsorption; Fat-soluble vitamins

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) with low gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) and Alagille syndrome are associated with persistent cholestasis and severe pruritus. Various types of biliary diversion have been used to reduce this pruritus and prevent liver dysfunction. We report our experience concerning the efficacy and safety of total biliary diversion (TBD) as an additional treatment option. Methods: TBD was performed in four PFIC patients and one patient with Alagille syndrome, and was accomplished by anastomosing a jejunal segment to the choledochal duct terminating as an end stoma, or by disconnecting the choledochal duct after previous cholecystojejunocutaneostomy. Results: TBD resulted in a marked improvement of symptoms and biochemical parameters in all PFIC patients. Despite relief of pruritus, cholestasis persisted in the Alagille patient. During 5-15 years of follow-up, no clinical signs of fat malabsorption such as diarrhea or weight loss were encountered. However, to maintain adequate levels of fat-soluble vitamins, especially of vitamin K, substantial supplementation was necessary. Conclusions: Total biliary diversion can be a useful surgical treatment option for patients with low-GGT PFIC and possibly also Alagille syndrome, when partial biliary diversion is insufficient. It can be performed without inducing clinical signs of fat malabsorption although individualized supplementation of fat-soluble vitamins with careful monitoring is warranted. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据