4.3 Article

Diminished Expression of Apical Sodium-Dependent Bile Acid Transporter in Gallstone Disease Is Independent of Ileal Inflammation

期刊

DIGESTION
卷 78, 期 1, 页码 52-59

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000159379

关键词

Inflammation; Apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter; Tumor necrosis factor-alpha; Interleukin-1 beta; Interleukin-8; c-jun; c-fos

资金

  1. Robert Bosch Foundation, Stuttgart

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Non-obese gallstone patients exhibit a diminished expression of apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter (ASBT) in terminal ileum. Crohn's ileitis demonstrates a significant downregulation of this transporter. Aim: To test whether subclinical ileal inflammation contributes to gallstone disease. Methods: Biopsies from terminal ileum of female subjects with gallstone disease (n = 7), active Crohn's disease (n = 17) and controls (n = 22) were investigated. mRNA expression of ASBT, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF- alpha), interleukin (IL)- 1 beta, IL-8, c-jun and c-fos was measured. c-jun and c-fos protein levels were determined and hematoxylin and eosin staining was applied for ileal histology. Results: ASBT expression was comparably low both in gallstone (47% of controls, p = 0.0093) and Crohn's disease (42% of controls, p = 0.0008). In gallstone disease there was a non-significant trend towards elevated TNF-alpha and IL-1 beta, but all cytokines were increased in active Crohn's disease. c-jun and c-fos were slightly diminished in patients with gallstones. Neither cytokines nor transcription factors correlated significantly with ASBT. The gallstone-associated ileal biopsies exhibited no histological inflammation. Conclusion: Although the expression of ASBT was similarly diminished in both gallstone and Crohn's disease, subclinical ileal inflammation does not appear to be relevant in gallstone patients. The mechanisms of transcriptional repression of ASBT in both diseases are apparently different. Copyright (C) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据