4.6 Article

Investigation of the combined effect of argon addition and substrate bias on the growth of ultrananocrystalline diamond layers

期刊

DIAMOND AND RELATED MATERIALS
卷 18, 期 12, 页码 1459-1465

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.diamond.2009.09.018

关键词

Microwave plasma CVD; In-situ mass spectrometry; UNCD; Bias

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In our recent project the combined effect of argon addition and substrate bias was investigated in the microwave plasma assisted chemical vapor deposition of diamond, focused on the ultrananocrystalline phase. Over the conventional qualifying techniques, i.e., Raman and SEM studies, we have led a special in-situ mass spectrometry investigation to explore the growth mechanism of UNCD, analysing the gas composition close to the surface. To achieve this aim, ion beam mass spectrometry (IBMS) was used for in-situ, real time, mass-selective analysis of the incoming species playing an important role in the MWPECVD (Microwave Plasma Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition) of the ultrananocrystalline diamond. In our experiments At, CH4, and H-2 gases were used as source gases in a wide range of concentrations applying different values of substrate bias to deposit different phases of diamond. By the IBMS technique we can measure the fluxes of different species: CxHy (x = 1-2, y = 0-2) during the phases of deposition, either under the conditions of microcrystalline diamond (MCD), nanocrystalline diamond (NCD) and ultrananocrystalline diamond (UNCD) synthesis. As a result of it, we can compare the different mechanisms of layer formation: i.e.: whether C-1 species or C-2 mediated growth method takes place, or probably both C-1 and C-2 species propagate the diamond lattice. Based on the given tendency by comparing the IBMS data (i.e.: fluxes of surface species) with the growth rate, morphology, and Raman spectra of the layers we propose, that in the case of UNCD a similar (but not exactly the same) growth mechanism can be found as in the case of MCD i.e.: C-1 species are the most likely precursors. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据