4.3 Article

Safety and efficacy of intravenous tigecycline in treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: results from a double-blind randomized phase 3 comparison study with levofloxacin

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2008.09.001

关键词

Community-acquired pneumonia; Tigecycline; Glycylcycline; Levofloxacin; Fluoroquinolone; Efficacy; Safety

资金

  1. Wyeth Research, Collegeville

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tigecycline exhibits potent in vitro activity against many community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) pathogens, including antibiotic-resistant ones. Its spectrum of activity and ability to penetrate lung tissue suggest it may be effective for hospitalized CAP patients. Hospitalized CAP patients (n = 418) were randomized to receive intravenous (IV) tigecycline or levofloxacin. Patients could be switched to oral levofloxacin after receiving 6 or more closes of IV study medication. Therapy duration was 7 to 14 days. Coprimary efficacy end points were clinical responses in the clinically evaluable (CE: tigecycline, n = 138; levofloxacin, n = 156) and clinical modified intent-to-treat (c-mITT: tigecycline, n = 191; levofloxacin, n = 203) populations at test-of-cure (TOC). Safety was assessed in the mITT population (tigecycline, n = 208; levofloxacin, n = 210). Cure rates in tigecycline and levofloxacin groups were comparable in CE (90.6% versus 87.2%, respectively) and c-mITT (78% versus 77.8%, respectively) populations at TOC. Nausea and vomiting occurred in significantly more tigecycline-treated patients, elevated alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels were reported in significantly more levofloxacin-treated patients. There were no significant differences in hospital length of stay, median

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据