4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Morbidity associated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2009.02.006

关键词

Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Bloodstream infection; Bacteremia; Epidemiology

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI053674, K02 AI065615-01, AI065615, K02 AI065615, R01 AI053674-01A1, AI053674] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We sought to quantify patient morbidity throughout Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infection (PABSI) as a function of patient covariates. Individuals with PABSI were included in a retrospective, observational, cohort study. Morbidity was quantified by serial Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores. Impact of active antimicrobial treatment was assessed as a function of changes in SOFA scores as the dependent variable. A total of 95 patients with PABSI were analyzed. Relative to baseline SOFA scores (day -2), scores after PABSI were increased by 37% on day 0 and 22% on day +2 but returned to baseline on day +7. Overall mortality was 37%, and mean length of hospital stay (postculture) was 16 days. Most patients were appropriately treated, with n = 83 (87%) receiving an active agent and n = 61 (64%) receiving >1 agent. As a result, an effect of therapy on morbidity was not observed. Advanced age and elevated baseline SOFA scores predicted increased in-hospital mortality (P = 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively) and morbidity at day +2 (P < 0.05 and P < 0.05, respectively) and day +7 (P < 0.05 and P < 0.001, respectively). Neutropenia was also associated with increased morbidity at day +2 (P < 0.05). In treated PABSI, morbidity is highest the day of the diagnostic blood cultures and slowly returns to baseline over the subsequent 7 days. Age and baseline severity of illness are the strongest predictors of morbidity and mortality. Because neither of these factors are modifiable, efforts to minimize the negative impact of PABSI should focus on appropriate prevention and infection control efforts. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据