4.7 Article

Differential white cell count and incident type 2 diabetes: the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study

期刊

DIABETOLOGIA
卷 57, 期 1, 页码 83-92

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00125-013-3080-0

关键词

Clinical science; Epidemiology; Human; Insulin sensitivity and resistance; Pathogenic mechanisms; Prediction and prevention of type 2 diabetes

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [HL-47887, HL-47889, HL-47890, HL-47892, HL-47902]
  2. General Clinical Research Centers Program (NCRR GCRC) [M01 RR431, M01 RR01346]
  3. NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVANCING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCES [KL2TR001118, UL1TR001120] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [M01RR001346] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [U01HL047892, U01HL047887, U01HL047890, U01HL047889] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims/hypothesis White cell count has been shown to predict incident type 2 diabetes, but differential white cell count has received scant attention. We examined the risk of developing diabetes associated with differential white cell count and neutrophil: lymphocyte ratio and the effect of insulin sensitivity and subclinical inflammation on white cell associations. Methods Incident diabetes was ascertained in 866 participants aged 40-69 years in the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study after a 5 year follow-up period. The insulin sensitivity index (SI) was measured by the frequently sampled IVGTT. Results C-reactive protein was directly and independently associated with neutrophil (p < 0.001) and monocyte counts (p < 0.01) and neutrophil: lymphocyte ratio (p < 0.001), whereas SI was inversely and independently related to lymphocyte count (p < 0.05). There were 138 (15.9%) incident cases of diabetes. Demographically adjusted ORs for incident diabetes, comparing the top and bottom tertiles of white cell (1.80 [95% CI 1.10, 2.92]), neutrophil (1.67 [1.04, 2.71]) and lymphocyte counts (2.30 [1.41, 3.76]), were statistically significant. No association was demonstrated for monocyte count (1.18 [0.73, 1.90]) or neutrophil: lymphocyte ratio (0.89 [0.55, 1.45]). White cell and neutrophil associations were no longer significant after further adjusting for family history of diabetes, fasting glucose and smoking, but the OR comparing the top and bottom tertiles of lymphocyte count remained significant (1.96 [1.13, 3.37]). This last relationship was better explained by SI rather than C-reactive protein. Conclusions/interpretation A lymphocyte association with incident diabetes, which was the strongest association among the major white cell types, was partially explained by insulin sensitivity rather than subclinical inflammation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据