4.7 Article

Improved patient survival with simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation in recipients with diabetic end-stage renal disease

期刊

DIABETOLOGIA
卷 56, 期 6, 页码 1364-1371

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00125-013-2888-y

关键词

Diabetic end-stage renal disease; Kidney graft survival; Kidney transplantation; Pancreas graft survival; Pancreatic transplantation; Patient survival

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We aimed to determine whether simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplantation would improve patient and kidney graft survival in diabetic end-stage renal disease (ESRD) compared with kidney transplantation alone (KTA). Follow-up data were retrieved for all 630 patients with diabetic ESRD who had received SPK or KTA at our centre from 1983 to the end of 2010. Recipients younger than 55 years of age received either an SPK (n = 222) or, if available, a single live donor kidney (LDK; n = 171). Older recipients and recipients with greater comorbidity received a single deceased donor kidney (DDK; n = 237). Survival was analysed by the Kaplan-Meier method and in multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusting for recipient and donor characteristics. Patient survival was superior in SPK compared with both LDK and DDK recipients in univariate analysis. Follow-up time (mean +/- SD) after transplantation was 7.1 +/- 5.7 years. Median actuarial patient survival was 14.0 years for SPK, 11.5 years for LDK and 6.7 years for DDK recipients. In multivariate analyses including recipient age, sex, treatment modality, time on dialysis and era, SPK transplantation was protective for all-cause mortality compared with both LDK (p = 0.02) and DDK (p = 0.029) transplantation. After the year 2000, overall patient survival improved compared with previous years (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.30, 0.55; p < 0.001). Pancreas graft survival also improved after 2000, with a 5 year graft survival rate of 78% vs 61% in previous years (1988-1999). Recipients of SPK transplants have superior patient survival compared with both LDK and DDK recipients, with improved results seen over the last decade.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据