4.7 Article

Partial inactivation of Ankrd26 causes diabetes with enhanced insulin responsiveness of adipose tissue in mice

期刊

DIABETOLOGIA
卷 54, 期 11, 页码 2911-2922

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00125-011-2263-9

关键词

Ankrd26; Diabetes; Energy intake restriction; Insulin sensitivity; Obesity; WAT

资金

  1. NIH
  2. NCI
  3. Center for Cancer Research
  4. NIDDK

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims/hypothesis ANKRD26 is a newly described gene located at 10p12 in humans, a locus that has been identified with some forms of hereditary obesity. Previous studies have shown that partial inactivation of Ankrd26 in mice causes hyperphagia, obesity and gigantism. Hypothesising that Ankrd26 mutant (MT) mice could develop diabetes, we sought to establish whether the observed phenotype could be (1) solely related to the development of obesity or (2) caused by a direct action of ankyrin repeat domain 26 (ANKRD26) in peripheral tissues. Methods To test the hypothesis, we did a full metabolic characterisation of Ankrd26 MT mice that had free access to chow or were placed under two different energy-restricted dietary regimens. Results Highly obese Ankrd26 MT mice developed an unusual form of diabetes in which white adipose tissue is insulin-sensitive, while other tissues are insulin-resistant. When obese MT mice were placed on a food-restricted diet, their weight and glucose homeostasis returned to normal. In addition, when young MT mice were placed on a pair-feeding diet with normal mice, they maintained normal body weight, but showed better glucose tolerance than normal mice, an increased responsiveness of white adipose tissue to insulin and enhanced phosphorylation of the insulin receptor. Conclusions/interpretation These findings show that the ANKRD26 protein has at least two functions in mice. One is to control the response of white adipose tissue to insulin; the other is to control appetite, which when Ankrd26 is mutated, leads to hyperphagia and diabetes in an obesity-dependent manner.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据