4.4 Article

Characterization of endothelial progenitor cells in the NOD mouse as a source for cell therapies

期刊

DIABETES-METABOLISM RESEARCH AND REVIEWS
卷 25, 期 1, 页码 89-93

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.898

关键词

autoimmune diabetes; endothelial progenitor cells; bone marrow cells; NOD mouse

资金

  1. Consortium Interuniversitario di Trapianti D'Organo
  2. Fondazione Livio Patrizi, Laboratori di Ricerca Gruppo BIOS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) in bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) contribute to tissue repair in various pathological conditions via the formation of new blood vessels. Previous studies indicate that diabetic patients have reduced EPC number and deregulated EPC function, although the regenerative properties of EPCs in diabetes are unknown. We wish to characterize and compare EPCs from pre-diabetic and diabetic non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice, a model of type I diabetes (T1D), in order to delineate the role of these cells in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diabetes. Methods Whole BM was obtained by flushing femurs, tibias and illiac crests from pre-diabetic and diabetic NOD mice (5-30 weeks) in which the diabetic status was confirmed by measuring blood glucose levels (>= 11.5 mmol/L); PB was collected in heparin-coated tubes and lysed after incubation with antibodies directed against EPCs. Results FACS analyses revealed a significant decrease in EPC number (CD31(+), c-Kit(+), Sca-1(+), Lin(-)) in BM from diabetic compared to pre-diabetic mice (P = 0.02). Conversely, EPC number was significantly increased in PB from diabetic compared to pre-diabetic mice (P = 0.01). Conclusions These data suggest that at the onset of diabetes BM-derived, EPCs are stimulated to enter the systemic circulation likely in response to signals from the pancreas. Further studies are required to elucidate whether EPCs home the damaged pancreas, thus representing a prospective source of autologous cells for beta-cell regeneration therapy. Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据