4.8 Article

Water in Inhomogeneous Nanoconfinement: Coexistence of Multi layered Liquid and Transition to Ice Nanoribbons

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 9, 期 10, 页码 9877-9884

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5b04947

关键词

inhomogeneous nanoconfinement; phase behavior; molecular dynamics; ice nanoribbon

资金

  1. 973 Program [2013CB932604, 2012CB933403]
  2. National NSF of China [11402113, 51472117, 51535005]
  3. Jiangsu NSF [BK20140807]
  4. National and Jiangsu Postdoctoral Research Funds [2014M550288, 1302015B]
  5. NUAA [1011-YAH13042]
  6. Key Laboratory for Intelligent Nano Materials and Devices of the Ministry of Education [INMD-2014M01]
  7. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [NJ20140001]
  8. US NSF [CHE-1306326, CBET-1512164]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phase behavior and the associated phase transition of water within inhonnogeneous nanoconfinement are investigated using molecular dynamics simulations. The nanoconfinement is constructed by a flat bottom plate and a convex top plate. At 300 K, the confined water can be viewed as a coexistence of monolayer, bilayer, and trilayer liquid domains to accommodate the inhomogeneous confinement. With increasing liquid density, the confined water with uneven layers transforms separately into two-dimensional ice crystals with unchanged layer number and rhombic in-plane symmetry for oxygen atoms. The monolayer water undergoes the transition first into a puckered ice nanoribbon, and the bilayer water transforms into a rhombic ice nanoribbon next, followed by the transition of trilayer water into a trilayer ice nanoribbon. The sequential localized liquid-to-solid transition within the inhomogeneous confinement can also be achieved by gradually decreasing the temperature at low liquid densities. These findings of phase behaviors of water under the inholnogeneous nanoconfinement not only extend the phase diagram of confined water but also have implications for realistic nanofluidic systems and microporous materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据