4.5 Article

Antidiabetic drug metformin is effective on the metabolism of asymmetric dimethylarginine in experimental liver injury

期刊

DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
卷 106, 期 2, 页码 295-302

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2014.08.028

关键词

Asymmetric dimethylarginine; Inflammation; Metformin; Arginine; Dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase; Liver injury

资金

  1. Istanbul University [T-24260, UDP-35774]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: We aimed to investigate the pharmacological efficiency of metformin on asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) metabolism in inflammation caused by the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)/D-galactosamine (D-GalN) treatment. Methods: Adult Sprague-Dawley rats were injected LPS/D-GalN intraperitoneally. One half of the animals was injected metformin (250 mg kg(-1) body mass for one week) prior to LPS/D-GalN treatment. Six hours after the LPS/D-GalN injection, livers were removed, and used for the measurements of dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase (DDAH) and myeloperoxidase (MPO) activities, glutathione (GSH), ADMA and arginine levels. Liver tissues were examined histopathologically. The Kruskal-Wallis (posthoc Mann-Whitney U) test was used for the statistics. LPS/D-GalN injections caused liver injury as evidenced by the activities of aminotransferases and arginase. GSH level and DDAH activity were decreased in the liver. Metformin pretreatment alleviated the activity of serum enzymes, and attenuated histopathological lesions caused by LPS/D-GalN injections. LPS/D-GalN-induced inflammation, as confirmed by the increased MPO activity, created an asymmetrical distribution of arginine and ADMA between the tissue and plasma. Metformin decreased tissue ADMA level while it restored the DDAH activity and GSH. Conclusion: Our findings showed that metformin administration for one week has a potency to protect liver through regulating ADMA metabolism in LPS/D-GalN-induced injury. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据