4.5 Article

Association of glucose measures with total and coronary heart disease mortality: Does the effect change with time? The Rancho Bernardo Study

期刊

DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
卷 86, 期 1, 页码 67-73

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2009.07.006

关键词

Diabetes mellitus; Coronary disease; Risk assessment; Glucose; Glucose tolerance test

资金

  1. National Institute of Diabetes & Digestive & Kidney Diseases [DK007386-28]
  2. NIH/NIA [AG028507]
  3. NIH/NCRR UCSF-CTSI [UL1 RR024130]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: To compare the associations of three glucose measures with coronary heart disease (CHD) and total mortality and to examine how these associations changed over time. Methods: Prospective study of 1774 adults (median age 68 years, 56% female). Fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2 h post-challenge glucose (2hPG), and glycohemoglobin (GHb) were obtained in 1984-1987. Mortality data was obtained for all participants. Multivariable Cox models examined the association of baseline glucose measures with mortality during sequential periods of follow-up (0-6, 7-12, and 13-18 years), adjusting for age, sex, blood pressure, LDL-cholesterol, smoking, exercise, and aspirin use. Results: 854 (48%) participants died during follow-up. In adjusted models, only GHb was associated with total mortality over the entire 18 years (p = 0.007). In analyses of mortality in successive six year time intervals, the association of GHb and total mortality was only significant in years 0-6. For each 1% increase in GHb, the hazard ratio for death in years 0-6 was 1.14 (95% CI 1.01-1.30, p = 0.04) and the hazard ratio for CHD death was 1.26 (95% CI 1.03-1.55, p = 0.02). Stratification by sex and exclusion of participants with diabetes did not change our results. Conclusions: Higher levels of GHb were associated with increased total and CHD mortality within the first six years independent of cardiac risk factors. Though further research is needed, this supports the hypothesis that early glycemic control may affect mortality outcomes. (C) Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据