4.7 Article

Serum bilirubin and ferritin levels link heme oxygenase-1 gene promoter polymorphism and susceptibility to coronary artery disease in diabetic patients

期刊

DIABETES CARE
卷 31, 期 8, 页码 1615-1620

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc07-2126

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE - Heme oxygenase (HO) leads to the generation of free iron, carbon monoxide, and bilirubin. A length polymorphism of GT repeats in the promoter of human HO-1 gene has been shown to modulate gene transcription. The aim of this study was to assess the association of the length of (GT)(n) repeats in the HO-1 gene promoter With Serum bilirubin, markers of iron status, and the development of coronary artery disease (CAD). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - We screened the allelic frequencies of (GT)(n) repeats in the HO-I gene promoter in 986 unrelated individuals who underwent coronary angiography. Serum bilirubin and markers of iron status were evaluated. RESULTS - The distribution of numbers of (CT)(n) repeats was divided into two subclasses: class S included shorter (<27) repeats,and class L included longer (>= 27) repeats. Among those with diabetes, Subjects With the L/L genotype had significantly lower bilirubin levels than those with S/S and S/L genotypes (0.70 +/- 0.22 vs. 081 +/- 0.24 mg/dl, P = 0.001) and higher serum ferritin values (4.76 +/- 0.72 vs. 4.28 +/- 1.05 mu g/l for log ferritin, P = 0.001). Compared With those carrying the S allele, diabetic Subjects with the L/L genotype had an almost threefold increase in CAD risk after controlling for conventional risk factors (odds ratio 2.81, [95% CI 1.22-6.47], P = 0.015). With adjustment for both serum bilirubin and ferritin , the effect of HO-1 promoter polymorphism on susceptibility to CAD disappeared. CONCLUSIONS - Length polymorphism in the HO-1 gene promoter is correlated with susceptibility to CAD in diabetic patients, and this effect might be conveyed through its influence oil serum bilirubin and ferritin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据