4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Age, BMI, and race are less important than random plasma glucose in identifying risk of glucose intolerance - The Screening for Impaired Glucose Tolerance Study (SIGT 5)

期刊

DIABETES CARE
卷 31, 期 5, 页码 884-886

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc07-2282

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCATS NIH HHS [UL1 TR000454] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [RR017643, RR00039, M01 RR000039, K12 RR017643] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDDK NIH HHS [F32 DK062668, R18 DK066204, T32 DK007298, DK062668, DK066204, DK07298] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE - Age, BMI, and race/ethnicity are used In National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) and American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines to prompt screening for pre-diabetes and diabetes, but cutoffs have not been evaluated rigorously. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Random plasma glucose (RPG) was measured and 75-g oral glucose tolerance tests were performed. in 1,139 individuals without known diabetes. Screening performance was assessed by logistic regression and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AROC). RESULTS - NIDDK/ADA indicators age > 45 years and BMI > 25 kg/m(2) provided significant detection of both diabetes and dysglycemia (both AROCs 0.63), but screening was better with continuous-variable models of age, BMI, and race and better still with models of age, BMI, race, sex, and family history (AROC 0.78 and 0.72). However, screening was even better with RPG alone (AROCs 0.81 and 0.72). RPG > 125 mg/dl could be used to prompt further evaluation with an OGTT. CONCLUSIONS - Use of age, BMI, and race/ethnicity in guidelines for screening to detect diabetes and pre-diabetes may be less important than evaluation of RPG. RPG should be investigated further as a convenient, inexpensive screen with good predictive utility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据