4.7 Article

Sestrin 3 Protein Enhances Hepatic Insulin Sensitivity by Direct Activation of the mTORC2-Akt Signaling

期刊

DIABETES
卷 64, 期 4, 页码 1211-1223

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db14-0539

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism [K08-AA-016570]
  2. Veterans Affairs Administration [1-I01-CX-000361-01]
  3. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [R01-DK-091592]
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R01DK091592] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM [K08AA016570] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. Veterans Affairs [I01CX000361] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sestrin proteins have been implicated in multiple biological processes including resistance to oxidative and genotoxic stresses, protection against aging-related pathologies, and promotion of metabolic homeostasis; however, the underlying mechanisms are incompletely understood. Some evidence suggests that sestrins may inhibit mTORC1 (mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1) through inhibition of RagA/B GTPases or activation of AMPK; however, whether sestrins are also involved in mTORC2 regulation and function is unclear. To investigate the functions and mechanisms of Sestrin 3 (Sesn3), we generated Sesn3 liver-specific transgenic and knockout mice. Our data show that Sesn3 liver-specific knockout mice exhibit insulin resistance and glucose intolerance, and Sesn3 transgenic mice were protected against insulin resistance induced by a high-fat diet. Using AMPK liver-specific knockout mice, we demonstrate that the Sesn3 insulin-sensitizing effect is largely independent of AMPK. Biochemical analysis reveals that Sesn3 interacts with and activates mTORC2 and subsequently stimulates Akt phosphorylation at Ser473. These findings suggest that Sesn3 can activate Akt via mTORC2 to regulate hepatic insulin sensitivity and glucose metabolism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据