4.7 Article

GLP-1R Agonism Enhances Adjustable Gastric Banding in Diet-Induced Obese Rats

期刊

DIABETES
卷 62, 期 9, 页码 3261-3267

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db13-0117

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health, Neuroendocrine Regulation of Adipocyte Metabolism [R01-DK-077975]
  2. University of Cincinnati [T32-DK-059803]
  3. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research Rubicon grant
  4. Ethicon Endo-Surgery
  5. Roche Pharmaceuticals
  6. Novo Nordisk
  7. Ablaris
  8. Zealand Pharma
  9. Pfizer
  10. Merck

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bariatric procedures vary in efficacy, but overall are more effective than behavioral and pharmaceutical treatment. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass causes increased secretion of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and reduces body weight (BW) more than adjustable gastric banding (AGB), which does not trigger increased GLP-1 secretion. Since GLP-1-based drugs consistently reduce BW, we hypothesized that GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists would augment the effects of AGB. Male Long-Evans rats with diet-induced obesity received AGB implantation or sham surgery. GLP-1R agonism, cannabinoid receptor-1 (CB1-R) antagonism, or vehicle was combined with inflation to evaluate interaction between AGB and pharmacological treatments. GLP1-R agonism reduced BW in both sham and AGB rats (left uninflated) compared with vehicle-treated animals. Subsequent band inflation was ineffective in vehicle-treated rats but enhanced weight loss stimulated by GLP1-R agonism. In contrast, there was no additional BW loss when CB1-R antagonism was given with AGB. We found band inflation to trigger neural activation in areas of the nucleus of the solitary tract known to be targeted by GLP-1R agonism, offering a potential mechanism for the interaction. These data show that GLP-1R agonism, but not CB1-R antagonism, improves weight loss achieved by AGB and suggest an opportunity to optimize bariatric surgery with adjunctive pharmacotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据