4.7 Article

Participation of Hindbrain AMP-Activated Protein Kinase in Glucoprivic Feeding

期刊

DIABETES
卷 60, 期 2, 页码 436-442

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db10-0352

关键词

-

资金

  1. Public Health Service [DK040498, DK00345072]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE-To examine the role of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) in the control of glucoprivic feeding by hindbrain catecholamine neurons. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-Micropunched hindbrain samples were collected from control and 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2DG)-injected rats for Western blot analysis of phosphorylated (activated) AMPK (pAMPK). Samples also were collected from 2DG-injected rats pretreated with anti-dopamine-beta-hydroxylase conjugated to saporin to lesion hindbrain catecholamine neurons. In a second experiment, rats were given a fourth-ventricle injection of compound C (CC) or 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxyamide ribonucleoside (AICAR), an inhibitor and activator of AMPK, to identify a role for AMPK in hindbrain neurons required for elicitation of 2DG-induced feeding. RESULTS-Systemic 2DG stimulated food intake in controls but not in catecholamine-lesioned rats. In controls, but not catecholamine-lesioned rats, 2DG also increased phosphorylated Thr172 at AMPK alpha subunits (pAMPK alpha) in hindbrain micropunches containing catecholaminergic cell groups A1 through the middle region of C1 (A1-C1m). Increased pAMPK alpha was not observed in the adjacent noncatecholaminergic ventromedial medulla or in the A2-C2 catecholamine cell groups in the dorsal hindbrain. Fourth-ventricle injection of CC attenuated 2DG-induced feeding during the first 2 h of the test, and AICAR alone increased food intake only during the first 60 min of the 4-h test. CONCLUSIONS-Results indicate that AMPK in catecholaminergic A1-C1m neurons is activated by glucoprivation. Therefore, AMPK may contribute to the glucose-sensing mechanism by which these neurons detect and signal a glucose deficit in the service of systemic glucoregulation. Diabetes 60:436-442, 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据