4.7 Article

In Vivo Adipogenesis in Rats Measured by Cell Kinetics in Adipocytes and Plastic-Adherent Stroma-Vascular Cells in Response to High-Fat Diet and Thiazolidinedione

期刊

DIABETES
卷 61, 期 1, 页码 137-144

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db10-1768

关键词

-

资金

  1. Nutrition Obesity Research Center (NORC) [1P30 DK072476]
  2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
  3. National Institutes of Health [DK060412]
  4. Centers of Biomedical Research Excellence grant (NIH) [P20-RR021945]
  5. National Institutes of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Impairment of adipogenesis contributes to the development of obesity-related insulin resistance. The current in vitro approaches for its assessment represent crude estimates of the adipogenic potential because of the disruption of the in vivo microenvironment. A novel assessment of in vivo adipogenesis using the incorporation of the stable isotope deuterium ((2)H) into the DNA of isolated adipocytes and stroma-vascular fraction from adipose tissue has been developed. In the current study, we have refined this technique by purifying the adipocytes via a negative immune selection and sorting the plastic adherent stroma-vascular (aSV) subfraction (using 3 h culture) that contains mostly adipocyte progenitor cells and similar to 10% of small adipocytes. Using a 3-week 8% (2)H(2)O ingestion with a high-fat diet (HFD) or HFD plus pioglitazone (HFD-P), we demonstrate that the fractions of new aSV cells (f(aSV)) and immunopurified adipocytes (f(AD)) (the ratio of their (2)H-enrichment of DNA to the maximal 2H-enrichment of DNA of bone marrow reference cells) recapitulate the known hyperplastic mechanism of weight gain with pioglitazone treatment. We conclude that f(aSV) and f(AD) are reliable indices of in vivo adipogenesis. The proposed method represents a valuable tool for studying the effect of interventions (drugs, diets, and exercise) on in vivo adipogenesis. Diabetes 61:137-144, 2012

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据